Victim of the Scam

Stop PAS – Or We’ll Kill You

In Parental Alienation, Parental Alienation Disorder, Parental Alienation Disorders, Parental Alienation Syndrome on July 15, 2010 at 12:06 am

Since 1985, abusers have come to convince family courts to ignore children’s allegations of abuse by invoking parental alienation and Parental Alienation Syndrome.  They wrongly claim that mothers are to blame because they are brainwashing their children.

PAS WIDELY DISCREDITED

 

1996 – The Report of the American Psychological Association Presidential Task Force on Violence and the Family discredited the theory. It stated:

Although there are no data to support the phenomenon called parental alienation syndrome, in which protective parents are blamed for interfering with their children’s attachment to their abusers, the term is still used by some evaluators and courts to discount children’s fears in hostile and psychologically abusive situations.[4] Family courts often do not consider the history of violence between the parents in making custody and visitation decisions. . . . Psychological evaluators not trained in domestic violence may contribute to this process by ignoring or minimizing the violence and by giving inappropriate pathological labels to women’s responses to chronic victimization. Terms such as “parental alienation” may be used to blame the women for the children’s reasonable fear of or anger toward their violent abuser.

2003 – The National District Attorneys Association’s Center for Prosecution of Child Abuse discredited the theory. It stated:

Although PAS may be hailed as a “syndrome” . . . in fact it is the product of anecdotal evidence gathered from Dr. Gardner’s own practice. […] PAS is based primarily upon two notions, neither of which has a foundation in empirical research. […] PAS is an untested theory that, unchallenged, can have far-reaching consequences for children seeking protection and legal vindication in courts of law.”

2006 – The American Bar Association’s Children’s Legal Rights Journal discredited the theory. It stated:

PAS’s twenty-year run in American courts is an embarrassing chapter in the history of evidentiary law. It reflects the wholesale failure of legal professionals entrusted with evidentiary gate-keeping intended to guard legal processes from the taint of pseudo-science…. As a matter of science, law, and policy PAS should remain inadmissible in American courts.


2006 – The
National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges also discredited the theory. It stated:

The discredited “diagnosis” of “PAS” (or allegation of “parental alienation”), quite apart from its scientific invalidity, inappropriately asks the court to assume that the children’s behaviors and attitudes toward the parent who claims to be “alienated” have no grounding in reality. It also diverts attention away from the behaviors of the abusive parent, who may have directly influenced the children’s responses by acting in violent, disrespectful, intimidating, humiliating and/or discrediting ways toward the children themselves, or the children’s other parent.

CONSEQUENCES

One of the most troubling consequences of Gardner’s theory is that, “PAS shifts attention away from the perhaps dangerous behaviour of the parent seeking custody to that of the custodial parent. This person, who may be attempting to protect the child, is instead presumed to be lying and poisoning the child.”

As a result, some children placed in the custody of their abusers have committed suicide; others have run away, and countless others have endured the abuse and are permanently traumatized. In recent years, children placed in custody of their abusers have been coming forward to tell their stories and to warn of the danger surrounding the fictitious syndrome.

Advertisements
  1. Lost my kids just 2 months ago because dad was the friendly parent and “would not alienate the children from their mother”.
    This after 7 years of marital abuse, and another 6 years inside the family court system.
    Now my kids, in 2 months, have been beaten, punched, drove around my a drunk driver, one bombed the last 10 weeks of school so badly he failed his grade. And the other is numb to the point of indifference.
    Way to go PAS, way to kill 2 more kids and their mom.

  2. Corrupt Fraud and Pathological Liar Janelle Burrill – Sacramento PAS Proponent enslaving children

    CNN iReport June 14 : Evidence of Janelle Burrill fraud http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-459109

    CNN ireport June 6 : Modern Day Slavery (PAS) Spotlight http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-456024

    CNN ireport June 5 : Spotlight Case 3 http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-455529

    CNN ireport June 4 : Spotlight Case 2 http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-454834

    CNN ireport May 28 : Spotlight Case 1 http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-450254

    CNN ireport May 24 : Apathy & Inaction http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-448492

    CNN ireport May 23 : Case Summary
    http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-447867

    Google “Janelle Burrill fraud”

  3. Identification of Parental Alienation Syndrome…

    I found your entry interesting thus I’ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog :)…

  4. “It’s a PROVEN FACT that the more time a father is allowed with his child, the more he contributes in every way to that child’s welfare. What so many fathers can no longer abide, is being intentionally aliented from their child, with no parental rights enforced, but STILL held responsible for them financially. It’s just not fair and it’s just not right for father OR child.
    Mothers- when you intentionally alienate your child from their father YOU ARE ALSO DESTROYING YOUR CHILD, and you SHOULD lose custody! Thank God there are new laws in the works, that will (hopefully) force judges to put an end to some of the intentional parental alienation that has been so rampant for so many years now. The law should protect every child’s right to BOTH parents.”

    This comment was supposedly made by a grandmother whose son was a victim of the system. To read the rest of this post:

    http://www.courthouseforum.com/forums/thread.php?id=1068206

    CourthouseForum – Judge Katrina West – 170.1 motion filed – replies.

    What are these new laws that are in the works?

    She twisted the whole story at http://abandonedoaths.wordpress.com/
    because this mother did everything she could to keep the father in her child’s life. When he didn’t pay child support and half of daycare, she could not return to her job so she moved with her mother in another state. Because she made this move on her own instead of when he told her to go, he got angry. So he got even. Mom lost good job at NBC News in Fort Worth and is now on welfare in California. Because of corrupt system against mothers that try to tell about abuse.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: