Victim of the Scam

NOW Foundation Opposes Phony Parental Alienation Disorder

In Dr. Richard Gardner, DSM-V, Parental Alienation, Parental Alienation Disorder, Parental Alienation Disorders, Parental Alienation Syndrome on April 24, 2010 at 3:53 am

From the National Organization of Women’s Foundation website:

Over the years, hundreds of women have contacted National Organization for Women chapters looking for assistance in their efforts to protect minor children in family court custody proceedings. Often these women have been accused of a phony psychiatric condition, termed Parental Alienation Disorder (PAD). The “disorder” has been proposed by so-called father’s rights (men’s custody) activists to be added to the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostics and Statistics Manual – V to give it more legitimacy than it currently has — or should have — in court.

This accusation is made by abusive ex-husbands and is intended to cause the courts to disregard mothers’ claims of fathers’ physical or sexual abuse in an effort to gain the fathers’ full or joint custody. NOW Foundation is concerned that because of the alienation accusation known batterers and child abusers have been awarded custody; the numbers of cases involving dads in custody disputes abusing and murdering children is appalling. (See link below)

The notion of a parental alienation in custody disputes was advanced by the late Dr. Richard Gardner who committed suicide in 2003. The alienation accusation has been embraced by men’s custody activists as an effective weapon to undermine mothers’ bid for legal custody of minor children. Many advocates on behalf of mothers believe that batterers, child abusers and pedophiles populate these men’s custody networks. There have been numerous instances of documented batterers and child abusers being awarded custody by biased family court judges.

NOW Foundation has sent a letter recently to the American Psychiatric Association noting that publications by the American Bar Association and the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges have concluded proposed “alienation disorder” is inadmissible in court and has been discredited by the scientific community. Accordingly, family court judges, lawyers and other court personnel should take action against the use of the alienation accusation in cases before them. Read NOW Foundation’s letter (PDF) and for more information on family court issues, go to the family law website.

More information on fathers and ex-partners involved in child custody or child support matters who have killed children, murdered mothers and/or committed suicide, please visit this website.

Advertisements
  1. PLEASE HELP!! CHILD ENSLAVED – ABUSED – DRUGGED

    FBI Agent Drew S. Parenti
    Sacramento Police Chief Rick Braziel
    Sacramento District Attorney Jan Scully, Investigator Sally L. Dominguez & Attorney Ruth Young
    Roseville Police Chief Mike Blair
    Placer District Attorney Bradford R. Fenocchio & Investigator David Coppin
    California Department of Consumer Affairs Director Brian Stiger
    California Board of behavioral Sciences Director Kim Madsen
    California Board BOP Director Robert Kahane

    We are victims of Sacramento based BBS licensee Janelle Burrill LCS 16216, unlicensed fraud psychologist and request a criminal investigation. Most of us were victimized by her under the color and authority of the law in her role as court appointed therapist.

    California Penal Code section 118-129 applies to Janelle Burrills conspiracy, malicious fraud & willful perjury. Section 92-100; 132-141 also apply in this case for fraud, conspiracy, intimidation and obstruction of justice.

    We all have been patiently waiting for the outcome of DCA investigations however, this is unacceptable criminal conduct and its time for law enforcement to see the pervasive corruption, fraud and child abuse being perpetuated by Janelle Burrill. Please protect children & California families from this corrupt fraud.

    2009 California Board of Behavioral Sciences Janelle Burrill Investigations (Status as of Jun 14 2010)

    1. 09-00739-BS filed Jan 30 2009 500 days, 1.370yr
    2. 09-00958-BS filed Feb 19 2009 480 days, 1.315yr
    3. 09-00973-BS filed May 28 2009 382 days, 1.047yr
    4. 09-01426-BS filed Nov 02 2009 224 days, 0.613yr
    5. 09-01427-BS filed Nov 02 2009 224 days, 0.613yr
    6. 1F-2010-205943 – Apr 06 2010 69 days
    7. 1F-2010-206255 – Apr 19 2010 56 days
    8. 1F-2010-205955 – May18 2010 27 days
    9. …many more …

    SPOTLIGHT ON CASE # 4

    Please look at this evidence, investigate and protect California children. The support group has encouraged this particular victim whose son is currently enslaved and being drugged by this corrupt fraud to contact you and file a formal criminal complaint. This Janelle Burrill victim had provided all of this evidence in October 2009 to the Sacramento & Placer County District Attorney’s office. These facts on conspiracy, willful perjury, fraud and child abuse is already in your possession for the last six months. Please look at it!!

    Allegation : Janelle Burrill conspired, fabricated DV allegations, enslaved & abused child, deliberately and maliciously lied under oath to committ willfull perjury at Placer County Superior Court. Perptuated a crime against this family. Pathological lying for money. Larceny, Extortion & racketeering.

    EVIDENCE # 1 : CHILD ABUSE BY JANELLE BURRILL BBS LCS 16216 on DEC 2 2008 : 915 UNIVERSITY AVE, SACRAMENTO CA ; 5 min clip from a one of many recordings attached ( Page 39 Line 11 – 25 ; Page 40 Line 14 – 18 ; Page 41 & Page 42 Line 1 – 14)

    Child : If there’s one thing that I don’t believe in, it’s people being experts in child custody.
    Child : I think it’s illegitimate. What is it that made you an expert in child custody?
    Burrill: Um, a lot of study. Four years, a lot of work for the Court, lots of studies, law degree, Ph.D.
    Child : I don’t think that’s something that can make anybody –
    Burrill: Researched a lot of .. Well, I’ve got more expertise than the average person, because I’ve done research.
    Child : But what I said earlier about research was
    Burrill: You don’t give a crap about it. You don’t think it holds water. A glass of water would fall right out of it.
    Child: That’s not what I mean. I’m saying for specific areas, research is legitimate.
    Burrill :What you’ve done here for the last hour is try to convince me that I am completely wrong, I know nothing, you know it all.

    EVIDENCE # 1 & BURRILL WILLFULL PERJURY : TESTIMONY UNDER OATH ABOUT DEC 2 CHILD ABUSE. MAR 2nd & MAR 10th 2009 PLACER SUPERIOR COURT, CALIFORNIA (RT Page 50 Line 25, Page 51 Line 1- 12 ; RT Page 144 Line 3-25 & Page 145 Line 1-6)
    BURRILL: No. Does it sound like I talk like that?
    THE COURT: So the answer is “no”?
    BURRILL: No. Never. No. No. No, I didn’t state that to a child. Never.
    Q. “You think you know it all. This system is crap”? BURRILL : Pardon me?
    Q. “You think you know it all. This system is crap.” C-r-a-p. Did you say that? BURRILL : No.
    EVIDENCE # 2 : July 8 2009 : PSYCHIATRIST FROM SUTTER – DEPOSITION Transcript : Page 8 Line 7-14, Page 27 Line 11-25 & Page 28 Line 1 – 25, Page 29 to Page 50 Line 1-24

    Child would tell me nothing but good things about his parent.
    And then to be quoted in court saying that I was rendering opinions on a phone call in which I am discussing clinical issues seems an error on her part, and not only that, I am misquoted.

    I contend that Janelle Burrill has her opinion and she provided her assessment to the court. That is not my job to get involved in. I don’t believe I said that. I don’t even think I would in any way get involved to that degree, It does not make sense to me.

    I was upset about being quoted by Janelle Burrill —- in court. I didn’t say things to her to make recommendations on how the case should be handled. She misquotes me to say child doesn’t have an ego. So then in that quote you just read, can his ego be rehabilitated, well, there is nothing wrong with this child’s ego.

    This child is incredibly intelligent and incredibly competent. She then misquotes me and says he doesn’t have an ego, which is absurd, so I was very upset by that. This child is exceedingly intelligent.

    He appeared to be depressed as a result of not being able to reunite with his parent. She recommended antipsychotic medication” “ She felt he was psychotic” Did you agree with her? No

    EVIDENCE # 2 BURRILL WILLFULL PERJURY : TESTIMONY UNDER OATH ABOUT PSYCHIATRIST MAR 10th 2009 PLACER SUPERIOR COURT, CALIFORNIA (RT Page Page 133 Line 9-21, Page 134 Line 11-25 & Page 135 Line 1-3)

    Eliminated is what his doctor said and that’s what I have said.
    Well, I’ll quote one of his doctors and I agree with his doctor completely. When he was first admitted to the hospital he said, “This child has no ego at all.

    He’s a robot component of his parent. That is also confirmed by his treating physician, psychiatrist who requested I — that I think there was a TRO going on or something and he called me up and he said, “This has got to be continued and made permanent.

    Their diagnosis of him, their treatment of him. Our interaction of “where do we go from here,” how does this child — “how do we mainstream this child again. The psychiatrists are saying the ego is gone.”

    EVIDENCE #3 PARENTAL ALIENATION SCAM THERAPY JANELLE BURRILL & JANAK MEHTANI – ENSLAVE, ABUSE & DRUG CHILDREN

    Burrill recommended antipsychotic medication” Burrill felt child was psychotic” Q. Did you agree with her? No PSYCHIATRIST FROM SUTTER RAISES THE RED FLAG OF CONSPIRACY & CORRUPTION, REFUSES TO COLLABORATE WITH JANELLE BURRILL – DOES NOT FORCE THE CHILD ON DRUGS TO FIX ALIENATION SCAM

    Allegation : Burrill forces the enslaved child to her friend, Ex-supervisor & Pill-Pusher JANAK MEHTANI – JANELLE BURRILL & JANAK MEHTANI CONSPIRE – DRUG ENSLAVED CHILD ON ANTI-PSYCHOTIC MEDS – DRUG ENSLAVED CHILD ON ANTI-DEPRESSENT MEDICATIONS.

    PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED THREE SETS OF EVIDENCE , INVESTIGATE & HELP THIS FAMILY

    “SUPPORT GROUP FOR VICTIMS OF JANELLE BURRILL”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: